Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive EMCA4 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 6% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EMCA4 - 17 vs 16 FPS
- Up to 15% cheaper than EMCA4 - €749.0 vs €879.0
- Up to 20% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than EMCA4 - €44.06 vs €54.94 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
2nd Variation
FPS
16
94.11764705882352%
Value, €/FPS
€54.94/FPS
80.19657808518384%
Price, €
€879
85%
Buy for €879 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74325 minutes ago
Buy for €749 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74316 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
2nd Variation
32nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
72.22692633361558%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
84.2506350550381%
32nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
100%
Multi-Core
8539
100%
CPU Winner
32nd Variation
Ryzen 5 4500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1555
76.63873829472647%
Multi-Core
6199
72.5963227544209%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5600 | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
