Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper CyberpowerPC Wyvern on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 103% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than CyberpowerPC Wyvern - 160 vs 79 FPS
- Up to 14% better value when playing Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than CyberpowerPC Wyvern - €8.74 vs €10.11 per FPS
Advantages of CyberpowerPC Wyvern PC
- Up to 43% cheaper than EMCA4 - €799.00 vs €1399.00
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
18th Variation
FPS
160
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.74/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1399
57%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 344 minutes ago
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 341 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
18th Variation
4th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
18th Variation
Radeon RX 7800 XT
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
233.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
583.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
4th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
51%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
41%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
18th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600X
4.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2863
100%
Multi-Core
12807
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | CyberpowerPC Wyvern PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600X | CPU | Ryzen 5 4500 |
| Radeon RX 7800 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 500 GB SSD |
