Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Golook on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Golook is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 120% better in Monster Hunter: World than Golook - 255 vs 116 FPS
Advantages of Golook PC
- Up to 58% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1049.0 vs €2499.0
- Up to 8% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - €9.04 vs €9.8 per FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €2,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 134 minutes ago
Buy for €1,049 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 130 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
17th Variation
17th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
17th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
17th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
25%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
25%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
17th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
null-core
Single-Core
2918
100%
Multi-Core
19633
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Golook PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i5-14400F |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
