Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 75% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - 542 vs 310 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 60% cheaper than EMCA4 - €999.0 vs €2499.0
- Up to 30% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - €3.22 vs €4.61 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
17th Variation
FPS
542
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.61/FPS
69.84815618221259%
Price, €
€2499
39%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74827 minutes ago
37th Variation
FPS
310
57.19557195571956%
Value, €/FPS
€3.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€999
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 74824 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
17th Variation
37th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
17th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
37th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
25.364735306377657%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
35.93163818257607%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
17th Variation
Ryzen 9 7950X3D
4.2 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2918
100%
Multi-Core
19633
100%
CPU Winner
37th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
72.68677176148046%
Multi-Core
9729
49.554321805124026%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
