Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Tiburcc on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Tiburcc is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 38% better in The Last of Us Part I than Tiburcc - 128 vs 93 FPS
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Up to 36% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1329.0 vs €2079.0
- Up to 12% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than EMCA4 - €14.29 vs €16.24 per FPS
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
16th Variation
FPS
128
100%
Value, €/FPS
€16.24/FPS
87.99261083743842%
Price, €
€2079
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,079 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 282 minutes ago
6th Variation
FPS
93
72.65625%
Value, €/FPS
€14.29/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1329
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,329 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 279 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
16th Variation
6th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
16th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
6th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
41.267194664443515%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
57.77407253022092%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700X
4.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2908
100%
Multi-Core
15263
100%
CPU Winner
6th Variation
Ryzen 5 7500F
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2744
94.36038514442916%
Multi-Core
12604
82.57878529777895%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Tiburcc Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | CPU | Ryzen 5 7500F |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
