Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Megaport on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Megaport is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 46% better in Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than Megaport - 202 vs 138 FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Up to 42% cheaper than EMCA4 - €1199.0 vs €2079.0
- Up to 16% better value when playing Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II than EMCA4 - €8.69 vs €10.29 per FPS
Call of Duty: Modern Warfare II
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
16th Variation
FPS
202
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.29/FPS
84.45092322643343%
Price, €
€2079
57%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,079 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 527 minutes ago
35th Variation
FPS
138
68.31683168316832%
Value, €/FPS
€8.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1199
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,199 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 525 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
16th Variation
35th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
16th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XTX
24 GB GDDR6 | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
479.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
959.6 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
35th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
41.267194664443515%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
57.77407253022092%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
16th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700X
4.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2908
100%
Multi-Core
15263
100%
CPU Winner
35th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
72.93672627235213%
Multi-Core
9729
63.742383541898704%
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 7700X | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| Radeon RX 7900 XTX | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
