Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms Megaport on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 8% better in Starfield than Megaport - 67 vs 62 FPS
- Up to 7% better value when playing Starfield than Megaport - €28.34 vs €30.63 per FPS
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
15th Variation
FPS
67
100%
Value, €/FPS
€28.34/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1899
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48258 minutes ago
36th Variation
FPS
62
92.53731343283582%
Value, €/FPS
€30.63/FPS
92.52366960496245%
Price, €
€1899
100%
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 48252 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
15th Variation
36th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
15th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
36th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
43.08093994778068%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
68.92093485827945%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
15th Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
91.39495798319328%
Multi-Core
15172
78.88114796714152%
36th Variation
Core i7-14700KF
3.4 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2975
100%
Multi-Core
19234
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 7 7800X3D | CPU | Core i7-14700KF |
Radeon RX 7900 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |