Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper PC fisso on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 6400% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than PC fisso - 65 vs 1 FPS
- Up to 98% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than PC fisso - €15.06 vs €799.0 per FPS
Advantages of PC fisso Computer PC
- Up to 18% cheaper than EMCA4 - €799.0 vs €979.0
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
13th Variation
FPS
65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€15.06/FPS
100%
Price, €
€979
81%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €979 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8342 minutes ago
Buy for €799 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 8345 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
13th Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
1st Variation
Radeon RX 580
8 GB GDDR5 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.88 GPixel/s
35%
Texel Fillrate
193 GTexel/s
55%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
13th Variation
Ryzen 7 5700X
3.4 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2121
100%
Multi-Core
9729
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | PC fisso Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 5700X | CPU | Core i7-4770 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | Radeon RX 580 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
