Key Differences
In short — Tiburcc outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 37% cheaper than Tiburcc - €999.0 vs €1580.0
- Up to 5% better value when playing Dead Space than Tiburcc - €13.32 vs €13.98 per FPS
Advantages of Tiburcc Computer PC
- Performs up to 51% better in Dead Space than EMCA4 - 113 vs 75 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
12th Variation
FPS
75
66.3716814159292%
Value, €/FPS
€13.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€999
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2408 minutes ago
8th Variation
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.98/FPS
95.27896995708154%
Price, €
€1580
63%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,580 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2406 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
12th Variation
8th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
59.64646464646465%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
42.60461760461761%
8th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
12 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
198 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
554.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Ryzen 5 7600
null-core
Single-Core
2735
95.83041345480028%
Multi-Core
12259
82.7863317125878%
8th Variation
Ryzen 7 7700
null-core
Single-Core
2854
100%
Multi-Core
14808
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Tiburcc Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 7600 | CPU | Ryzen 7 7700 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
