Key Differences
In short — Gaming outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 53% cheaper than Gaming - €839.00 vs €1779.00
- Up to 16% better value when playing Monster Hunter: World than Gaming - €6.50 vs €7.70 per FPS
Advantages of Gaming PC
- Performs up to 79% better in Monster Hunter: World than EMCA4 - 231 vs 129 FPS
Monster Hunter: World
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Buy for €839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 170 minutes ago
Buy for €1,779 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 169 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
10th Variation
44th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
26%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
43%
44th Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
44th Variation
Ryzen 9 7900
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2824
100%
Multi-Core
16743
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Ryzen 9 7900 |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
| 16 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
