Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 396% better in World of Tanks than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 238 vs 48 FPS
- Up to 77% better value when playing World of Tanks than Ankermann Business V2 Work - €3.53 vs €15.19 per FPS
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 13% cheaper than EMCA4 - €729.0 vs €839.0
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
10th Variation
FPS
238
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€839
86%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €839 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73785 minutes ago
FPS
48
20.168067226890756%
Value, €/FPS
€15.19/FPS
23.23897300855826%
Price, €
€729
100%
Buy for €729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 73786 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
10th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
1.33114215283484%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
1.8793503480278424%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1871
100%
Multi-Core
7692
100%
CPU Winner
EMCA4 Computer PC | vs | Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 5 5500 | CPU | Core i7-10700F |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce GT 710 |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |