Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper DILC, Neptune I, on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing DILC, Neptune I, is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of DILC, Neptune I, PC
- Up to 49% cheaper than EMCA4 - €739.0 vs €1449.0
- Up to 2% better value when playing Rocket League than EMCA4 - €3.57 vs €3.65 per FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 92% better in Rocket League than DILC, Neptune I, - 397 vs 207 FPS
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Buy for €739 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76821 minutes ago
50th Variation
FPS
397
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.65/FPS
97.80821917808218%
Price, €
€1449
51%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76830 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
50th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
46.721446179129%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
41.24129930394431%
50th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
50th Variation
Core i7-13700F
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2661
100%
Multi-Core
15475
100%
CPU Winner
DILC, Neptune I, PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 5 4500 | CPU | Core i7-13700F |
| GeForce RTX 3050 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
