Key Differences
In short — CyberpowerPC Luxe outperforms the cheaper ERAZER on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing ERAZER is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of CyberpowerPC Luxe PC
- Performs up to 26% better in Counter-Strike 2 than ERAZER - 300 vs 238 FPS
Advantages of ERAZER Desktop PC
- Up to 33% cheaper than CyberpowerPC Luxe - €752.31 vs €1129.88
- Up to 16% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than CyberpowerPC Luxe - €3.16 vs €3.77 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for €1,129.88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3765 minutes ago
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
FPS
238
79%
Value, €/FPS
€3.16/FPS
100%
Price, €
€752.31
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €752.31 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 109546 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
3rd Variation
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3060
12 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
85.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
199 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
62%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
46%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-11900KF
3.5 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2317
100%
Multi-Core
10125
100%
CPU Winner
Feb 25th, 2022 • 1st Variation
Core i5-12400F
2.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2191
94%
Multi-Core
8910
88%
CyberpowerPC Luxe PC | vs | ERAZER Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Feb 25th, 2022 |
| Core i9-11900KF | CPU | Core i5-12400F |
| GeForce RTX 3060 | GPU | GeForce GTX 1650 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
