Key Differences
In short — Continuum Micro outperforms Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Continuum Micro Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 25% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 - 116 vs 93 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
9th Variation
Nov 13th, 2023
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
9th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Nov 13th, 2023
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
74%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
9th Variation
Core i7-12700KF
3.6 GHz | 12-core
Single-Core
2536
100%
Multi-Core
13687
100%
CPU Winner
Nov 13th, 2023
Core i5-13400F
2.5 GHz | 10-core
Single-Core
2303
91%
Multi-Core
11011
80%
Continuum Micro Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Thermaltake LCGS Quartz i460 R4 Gaming Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Nov 13th, 2023 |
| Core i7-12700KF | CPU | Core i5-13400F |
| GeForce RTX 3070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 3 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |
