The Centaurus Polaris 4AW is at least 2x slower gaming PC Build than the EMCA4. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
The EMCA4 Computer PC is better in every way
Advantages of the EMCA4 Computer PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
Centaurus Polaris 4AW vs EMCA4 for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Average FPS
49
28%
Min 1% FPS
22
20%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EMCA4 Computer PC
52nd Variation
Average FPS
177
100%
Min 1% FPS
112
100%
Price, €
€1579
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.92/FPS
100%
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Arc A380
6 GB GDDR6 | 96-bit
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
14%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
8%
EMCA4 Computer PC
52nd Variation
Radeon RX 7900 XT
20 GB GDDR6 | 320-bit
Pixel Fillrate
459.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
804.4 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
51.48 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2206
92%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
11922
100%
EMCA4 Computer PC
52nd Variation
Core i7-12700F
2.1 GHz | 12-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2402
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
11831
99%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Release Date | – |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Core i7-12700F |
| Arc A380 | GPU | Radeon RX 7900 XT |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB | SSD | – |
| – | HDD | – |
