The Centaurus Polaris 4AW is at least 2x slower gaming PC Build than the EMCA4. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
The EMCA4 Computer PC is better in every way
Advantages of the EMCA4 Computer PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
Centaurus Polaris 4AW vs EMCA4 for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Average FPS
49
25%
Min 1% FPS
22
17%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EMCA4 Computer PC
49th Variation
Average FPS
198
100%
Min 1% FPS
126
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Arc A380
6 GB GDDR6 | 96-bit
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
23%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
16%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
8%
EMCA4 Computer PC
49th Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
52.22 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC
Ryzen 9 5900X
3.7 GHz | 12-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2206
71%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
11922
58%
EMCA4 Computer PC
49th Variation
Core i9-14900KF
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
3091
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
20685
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Centaurus Polaris 4AW PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Release Date | – |
| Ryzen 9 5900X | CPU | Core i9-14900KF |
| Arc A380 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB | SSD | – |
| – | HDD | – |
