The Centaurus Monolith 2 is a much slower gaming PC Build than the EMCA4. We cannot compare value as at least one PC Build is out of stock.
Advantages of the Centaurus Monolith 2 Desktop PC
The EMCA4 Computer PC is better in every way
Advantages of the EMCA4 Computer PC
- At least 2x faster PC Build for gaming
Centaurus Monolith 2 vs EMCA4 for Gaming
The PC's performance in selected game and settings
Centaurus Monolith 2 Desktop PC
Average FPS
59
58%
Min 1% FPS
28
48%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
EMCA4 Computer PC
10th Variation
Average FPS
101
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, €
€839
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.3/FPS
100%
My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Centaurus Monolith 2 Desktop PC
Arc A380
6 GB GDDR6 | 96-bit
Pixel Fillrate
65.6 GPixel/s
54%
Texture Fillrate
131.2 GTexel/s
38%
FP32
4.198 TFLOPS
19%
EMCA4 Computer PC
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
22.06 TFLOPS
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 6 benchmark scores
Centaurus Monolith 2 Desktop PC
Core i9-12900K
3.2 GHz | 16-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
2642
100%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
15520
100%
EMCA4 Computer PC
10th Variation
Ryzen 5 5500
3.6 GHz | 6-core
Geekbench 6 Single-Core
1874
71%
Geekbench 6 Multi-Core
7688
50%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Centaurus Monolith 2 Desktop PC | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
General | ||
- | Release Date | - |
Core i9-12900K | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
Arc A380 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
1 TB | SSD | - |
- | HDD | - |