Key Differences
In short — Megaport outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 Work on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Ankermann Business V2 Work is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC
- Up to 59% cheaper than Megaport - €759.0 vs €1849.0
- Up to 13% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Megaport - €9.37 vs €10.81 per FPS
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 111% better in World of Warcraft than Ankermann Business V2 Work - 171 vs 81 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
FPS
81
47.368421052631575%
Value, €/FPS
€9.37/FPS
100%
Price, €
€759
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €759 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1145 minutes ago
7th Variation
FPS
171
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.81/FPS
86.67900092506937%
Price, €
€1849
41%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,849 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1145 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
7th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GT 710
1 GB DDR3 | 64-bit
Pixel Fillrate
1.62 GPixel/s
0.9782608695652175%
Texel Fillrate
6.48 GTexel/s
2.0415879017013236%
7th Variation
GeForce RTX 3070
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
165.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
317.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
7th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
100%
Multi-Core
8659
100%
CPU Winner
Ankermann Business V2 Work Desktop PC | vs | Megaport PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Core i7-10700F | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
GeForce GT 710 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3070 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |