Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the cheaper Ankermann Business V2 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Ankermann Business Gaming V2 PC
- Up to 25% cheaper than EMCA4 - €729.0 vs €969.0
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 221% better in No Man's Sky than Ankermann Business V2 - 135 vs 42 FPS
- Up to 59% better value when playing No Man's Sky than Ankermann Business V2 - €7.18 vs €17.36 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
42
31.11111111111111%
Value, €/FPS
€17.36/FPS
41.3594470046083%
Price, €
€729
100%
Buy for €729 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 267 minutes ago
38th Variation
FPS
135
100%
Value, €/FPS
€7.18/FPS
100%
Price, €
€969
75%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €969 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 560 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
38th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
43.779786359901394%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
27.04176334106728%
38th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB
16 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
38th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
3.7 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2092
100%
Multi-Core
8659
100%
CPU Winner
Ankermann Business Gaming V2 PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 7 1700X | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 16 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
