Key Differences
In short — EMCA4 outperforms Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 16% better in Deathloop than Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation - 130 vs 112 FPS
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
112
86%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
55th Variation
FPS
130
100%
Value, €/FPS
€11.53/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1499
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1355 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
55th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
76%
GPU Winner
55th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
55th Variation
Core i5-14600KF
3.5 GHz | 14-core
Single-Core
2769
95%
Multi-Core
15636
80%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Video Editing Modelling Workstation Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
---|---|---|
Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i5-14600KF |
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
10 TB HDD | Storage | N/A Storage |