Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms Skytech O11V on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 15% better in Counter-Strike 2 than Skytech O11V - 579 vs 502 FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
FPS
579
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Aug 23rd, 2024 • 1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
Aug 23rd, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER
16 GB GDDR6X | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
285.6 GPixel/s
64%
Texel Fillrate
816 GTexel/s
63%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Aug 23rd, 2024 • 1st Variation
Ryzen 7 7800X3D
4.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2719
93%
Multi-Core
15172
77%
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Skytech O11V Gaming PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Aug 23rd, 2024 |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 7 7800X3D |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4080 SUPER |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
