Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms NSX GAMING on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 324% better in World of Tanks than NSX GAMING - 590 vs 139 FPS
World of Tanks
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
590
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
56.86 GPixel/s
13%
Texel Fillrate
142.2 GTexel/s
11%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | NSX GAMING PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Ryzen 5 5500 |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
