Background
Background
Background
Background
Background

Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation vs Mavark 4K PC Comparison

Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation vs Mavark 4K: game performance, price, value, and specification comparison. Select comparison game parameters.

Key Differences

In short — Mavark 4K outperforms Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.

Advantages of Mavark 4K Gaming PC

  • Performs up to 1% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation - 164 vs 163 FPS
Calculator background
This is a free version of Star Wars Jedi: Survivor.
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor

Star Wars Jedi: Survivor

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic


FPS

164

100%

Value, €/FPS

Price, €

FPS Winner

My Games

With selected game settings

Resolution

1920 x 1080

Game Graphics

Epic

GPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance


NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4090 Logo
GeForce RTX 4090

24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit

Pixel Fillrate

443.5 GPixel/s

100%

Texel Fillrate

1290 GTexel/s

100%

GPU Winner

CPU Comparison

Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores

Full CPU Comparison
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC Image

Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC

vs
Mavark 4K Gaming PC Image

Mavark 4K Gaming PC

UnknownUnknown
Ryzen 9 7950X3DCore i9-13900K
GeForce RTX 4090GeForce RTX 4090
64 GB
16 GB
N/A Storage8 TB SSD

Popular Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC and Mavark 4K Gaming PC Comparisons

Compare 2 PCs in Games

Copyright © 2025 HowManyFPS. All rights reserved.

Have a suggestion or a business inquiry? [email protected]

Cookies Policy

As an Amazon Associate HowManyFPS earns from qualifying purchases.