Key Differences
In short — Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation outperforms Dell XPS 8960 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both PC Builds to compare value.
Advantages of Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC
- Performs up to 110% better in Dead Space than Dell XPS 8960 - 166 vs 79 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
FPS
166
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
29th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
GeForce RTX 4090
24 GB GDDR6X | 384-bit
Pixel Fillrate
443.5 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
1290 GTexel/s
100%
29th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
27%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
18%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
29th Variation
Core i9-14900K
3.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
3101
100%
Multi-Core
21000
100%
CPU Winner
Adamant Custom 16-Core Editing Modelling Rendering Workstation Gaming Desktop PC | vs | Dell XPS 8960 Desktop PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Ryzen 9 7950X3D | CPU | Core i9-14900K |
| GeForce RTX 4090 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 64 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 512 GB SSD |