Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Orion 3000 PO3-655 outperforms the cheaper EMCA4 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing EMCA4 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Orion 3000 PO3-655 Desktop PC
- Performs up to 41% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EMCA4 - 437 vs 310 FPS
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Up to 49% cheaper than Acer Predator Orion 3000 PO3-655 - €959.00 vs €1896.00
- Up to 29% better value when playing Counter-Strike 2 than Acer Predator Orion 3000 PO3-655 - €3.09 vs €4.34 per FPS
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Feb 2nd, 2024
FPS
437
100%
Value, €/FPS
€4.34/FPS
71%
Price, €
€1896
50%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,896 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2046 minutes ago
Buy for €959 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2049 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Feb 2nd, 2024
13th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 2nd, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070
12 GB GDDR6X | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
158.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
455.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
13th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
121.7 GPixel/s
77%
Texel Fillrate
344.8 GTexel/s
76%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 2nd, 2024
Core i7-14700F
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2775
100%
Multi-Core
17332
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Orion 3000 PO3-655 Desktop PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 2nd, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i7-14700F | CPU | Ryzen 7 5700X |
| GeForce RTX 4070 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Ti 8 GB |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | N/A Storage |
