Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Megaport outperforms the more expensive on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of Megaport PC
- Performs up to 111% better in No Man's Sky than - 116 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 36% cheaper than - €899.0 vs €1399.0
- Up to 70% better value when playing No Man's Sky than - €7.75 vs €25.44 per FPS
No Man's Sky
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for €1,399 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 136 minutes ago
Buy for €899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 135 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
1st Variation
10th Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce GTX 1650
4 GB GDDR5 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
53.28 GPixel/s
45%
Texel Fillrate
93.24 GTexel/s
39%
10th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
10th Variation
Ryzen 5 5600
3.5 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
2029
100%
Multi-Core
8539
100%
CPU Winner
Computer PC | vs | Megaport PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-9900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600 |
| GeForce GTX 1650 | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
