Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — EMCA4 outperforms the more expensive on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck!
Advantages of EMCA4 Computer PC
- Performs up to 10% better in Battlefield 1 than - 148 vs 134 FPS
- Up to 46% cheaper than - €829.0 vs €1529.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than - €5.6 vs €11.41 per FPS
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
FPS
134
90.54054054054053%
Value, €/FPS
€11.41/FPS
49.07975460122699%
Price, €
€1529
54%
Buy for €1,529 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1893 minutes ago
22nd Variation
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€5.6/FPS
100%
Price, €
€829
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €829 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1892 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
3rd Variation
22nd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
3rd Variation
Radeon RX 6600 XT
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
165.7 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
331.4 GTexel/s
100%
22nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060
8 GB | System-Shared
Pixel Fillrate
118.1 GPixel/s
71.27338563669282%
Texel Fillrate
236.2 GTexel/s
71.27338563669282%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
3rd Variation
Core i9-9900KF
null-core
Single-Core
1691
80.83173996175908%
Multi-Core
8053
93.00150132809793%
22nd Variation
Ryzen 5 5600X
null-core
Single-Core
2092
100%
Multi-Core
8659
100%
CPU Winner
Computer PC | vs | EMCA4 Computer PC |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-9900KF | CPU | Ryzen 5 5600X |
| Radeon RX 6600 XT | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | N/A Storage |
