Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Razer Blade Pro 17 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1447 days newer than Razer Blade Pro 17.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 79% better in Rust than Razer Blade Pro 17 - 113 vs 63 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
113
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.69/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1999
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 435 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
May 15th, 2020 • 1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 15th, 2020 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
99.84 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
299.5 GTexel/s
100%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
81%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
82%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 15th, 2020 • 1st Variation
Core i7-10875H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1520
63%
Multi-Core
6574
57%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Razer Blade Pro 17 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| May 15th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-10875H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 2080 SUPER Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
3840x2160 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 120 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
