Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms MSI Vector GP76 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 811 days newer than MSI Vector GP76.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 2% better in Forza Horizon 4 than MSI Vector GP76 - 234 vs 230 FPS
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
May 1st, 2024
FPS
234
100%
Value, €/FPS
€8.12/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1899
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7035 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Feb 10th, 2022
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 10th, 2022
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
148.3 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
296.6 GTexel/s
100%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
55%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
82%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 10th, 2022
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
96%
Multi-Core
10780
94%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
MSI Vector GP76 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
---|---|---|
Feb 10th, 2022 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
GeForce RTX 3080 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
360 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |