Key Differences
In short — ASUS TUF A16 outperforms MSI Katana GF76 17 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of ASUS TUF A16 Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 81% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than MSI Katana GF76 17 - 87 vs 48 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
2nd Variation
Dec 19th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
47%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
37%
Dec 19th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core i7-11800H
2.3 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1900
97%
Multi-Core
7887
85%
Dec 19th, 2024 • 3rd Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
100%
Multi-Core
9281
100%
CPU Winner
MSI Katana GF76 17 Gaming Laptop | vs | ASUS TUF A16 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Dec 19th, 2024 |
| Core i7-11800H | CPU | Ryzen 7 7735HS |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
