Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms HP OMEN 17-cb0005na 17.3 Inch FHD 144 Hz on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 1799 days newer than HP OMEN 17-cb0005na 17.3 Inch FHD 144 Hz.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 159% better in Star Wars Jedi: Survivor than HP OMEN 17-cb0005na 17.3 Inch FHD 144 Hz - 75 vs 29 FPS
Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
May 1st, 2024
FPS
75
100%
Value, €/FPS
€25.32/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1899
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 7150 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
May 29th, 2019
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 29th, 2019
GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile
6 GB GDDR6 | 192-bit
Pixel Fillrate
57.6 GPixel/s
71%
Texel Fillrate
144 GTexel/s
59%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 29th, 2019
Core i7-9750H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1351
56%
Multi-Core
4930
43%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
HP OMEN 17-cb0005na 17.3 Inch FHD 144 Hz Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| May 29th, 2019 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i7-9750H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 2060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 512 GB SSD + 1 TB HDD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
