Key Differences
In short — Notebook outperforms GIGABYTE AERO 16 XE5-16" 4K/UHD+ Samsung AMOLED, Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Notebook is 1018 days older than GIGABYTE AERO 16 XE5-16" 4K/UHD+ Samsung AMOLED, Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti.
Advantages of Notebook
- Performs up to 6% better in F1 22 than GIGABYTE AERO 16 XE5-16" 4K/UHD+ Samsung AMOLED, Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti - 149 vs 140 FPS
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mar 15th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
FPS
140
94%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mar 15th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
Jun 1st, 2019 • 3rd Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Mar 15th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
135.4 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
259.4 GTexel/s
100%
Jun 1st, 2019 • 3rd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
60%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
94%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Mar 15th, 2022 • 2nd Variation
Core i7-12700
2.1 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2293
87%
Multi-Core
10780
73%
Jun 1st, 2019 • 3rd Variation
Core i7-13700
2.1 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2632
100%
Multi-Core
14759
100%
CPU Winner
GIGABYTE AERO 16 XE5-16" 4K/UHD+ Samsung AMOLED, Intel Core i7-12700H, NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Laptop | vs | Notebook |
|---|---|---|
Mar 15th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 1st, 2019 |
| Core i7-12700 | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 3070 Ti Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
3840x2160 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
