Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Asus TUF A16 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 14% better in World of Warcraft than Asus TUF A16 - 174 vs 152 FPS
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
May 1st, 2024
FPS
174
100%
Value, €/FPS
€10.91/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1899
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4695 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
12th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
12th Variation
Ryzen 7 7735HS
3.2 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
1964
82%
Multi-Core
9281
81%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
Asus TUF Gaming A16 Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 7735HS | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
