Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms ASUS TUF F17 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 121% better in Mass Effect: Andromeda than ASUS TUF F17 - 148 vs 67 FPS
Mass Effect: Andromeda
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
148
100%
Value, €/FPS
€13.51/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1999
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 326 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
11th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
11th Variation
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
11th Variation
Core i5-11260H
2.6 GHz | 6-core
Single-Core
1749
73%
Multi-Core
6159
54%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
CPU Winner
ASUS TUF F17 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i5-11260H | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 144 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 17.3" | Screen Size | 16" |
