Key Differences
In short — ASUS outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing ASUS is 434 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of ASUS Laptop
- Performs up to 53% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 164 vs 107 FPS
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
May 1st, 2024
FPS
107
65%
Value, €/FPS
€18.68/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1999
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 359 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Feb 22nd, 2023 • 7th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 22nd, 2023 • 7th Variation
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
16 GB GDDR6 | 256-bit
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
43%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
47%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 22nd, 2023 • 7th Variation
Ryzen 9 7945HX
2.5 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2731
100%
Multi-Core
15746
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
88%
Multi-Core
11484
73%
ASUS Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 22nd, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 9 7945HX | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
2560x1440 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
