Key Differences
In short — ASUS outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing ASUS is 434 days older than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of ASUS Laptop
- Performs up to 13% better in Rust than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 128 vs 113 FPS
Rust
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
May 1st, 2024
FPS
113
88%
Value, €/FPS
€16.81/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1899
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6326 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Feb 22nd, 2023 • 5th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Feb 22nd, 2023 • 5th Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Feb 22nd, 2023 • 5th Variation
Core i9-13900
2.0 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2714
100%
Multi-Core
16426
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
88%
Multi-Core
11484
70%
ASUS Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 22nd, 2023 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-13900 | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 1 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
240 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
