Key Differences
In short — acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA outperforms HP Victus i7 RTX 4060 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 14% better in Control than HP Victus i7 RTX 4060 - 100 vs 88 FPS
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
2nd Variation
FPS
100
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
2nd Variation
1st Variation
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
2nd Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
2nd Variation
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2251
90%
Multi-Core
12037
87%
1st Variation
Core i7-14700HX
2.1 GHz | 20-core
Single-Core
2515
100%
Multi-Core
13757
100%
CPU Winner
acer Predator Triton Neo 16" WQXGA Gaming Laptop | vs | HP Victus i7 RTX 4060 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i7-14700HX |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 64 GB |
| 4 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 60 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16.1" |
