Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms HP Victus 16.1" FHD on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 65% better in Dead Space than HP Victus 16.1" FHD - 76 vs 46 FPS
Dead Space
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
76
100%
Value, €/FPS
€26.30/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1999
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 306 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
4 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
42.28 GPixel/s
52%
Texel Fillrate
67.65 GTexel/s
28%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2251
100%
Multi-Core
12037
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook | vs | HP Victus 16.1" FHD Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| May 1st, 2024 | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core Ultra 9 185H | CPU | Core i7-11800H |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile |
32 GB | RAM | 8 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 512 GB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 60 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16.1" |
