Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Helios Neo Notebook outperforms the cheaper TULPAR T7 V20.6 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing TULPAR T7 V20.6 is a better bang for your buck.
Advantages of Acer Predator Helios Neo Notebook
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than TULPAR T7 V20.6 - 49 vs 37 FPS
Advantages of TULPAR T7 V20.6 Gaming Laptop
- Up to 58% cheaper than Acer Predator Helios Neo Notebook - €1139.0 vs €2689.0
- Up to 44% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Acer Predator Helios Neo Notebook - €30.78 vs €54.88 per FPS
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
1st Variation
FPS
49
100%
Value, €/FPS
€54.88/FPS
56.08600583090379%
Price, €
€2689
42%
FPS Winner
Buy for €2,689 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75382 minutes ago
FPS
37
75.51020408163265%
Value, €/FPS
€30.78/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1139
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,139 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 158163 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
89.68253968253968%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
GPU Winner
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74.313805817288%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
1st Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
Acer Predator Helios Neo Notebook | vs | TULPAR T7 V20.6 Gaming Laptop |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | Release Date | Unknown |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core i7-13700 |
| GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile |
64 GB | RAM | 16 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 1 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 144 Hz |
| 18" | Screen Size | 15.6" |
