Key Differences
In short — acer Predator Helios-Neo outperforms Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing acer Predator Helios-Neo is 173 days newer than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook.
Advantages of acer Predator Helios-Neo Gaming Laptop
- Performs up to 9% better in Dirt 5 than Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook - 140 vs 128 FPS
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Oct 21st, 2024 • 12th Variation
FPS
140
100%
Value, €/FPS
Price, €
FPS Winner
May 1st, 2024
FPS
128
91%
Value, €/FPS
€15.62/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1999
100%
Value Winner
Buy for €1,999 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 316 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Oct 21st, 2024 • 12th Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Oct 21st, 2024 • 12th Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
GPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Oct 21st, 2024 • 12th Variation
Core i9-14900HX
2.2 GHz | 24-core
Single-Core
2802
100%
Multi-Core
16516
100%
CPU Winner
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
86%
Multi-Core
11484
70%
acer Predator Helios-Neo Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
Oct 21st, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Core i9-14900HX | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 32 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| 2 TB SSD | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
