Key Differences
In short — Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook outperforms Acer Nitro 16 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both Laptops to compare value. The better performing Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook is 26 days newer than Acer Nitro 16.
Advantages of Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook
- Performs up to 16% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Acer Nitro 16 - 65 vs 56 FPS
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
May 1st, 2024
FPS
65
100%
Value, €/FPS
€29.22/FPS
100%
Price, €
€1899
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for €1,899 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4406 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Apr 5th, 2024 • 1st Variation
May 1st, 2024
GPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and theoretical performance
Apr 5th, 2024 • 1st Variation
GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
90.72 GPixel/s
100%
Texel Fillrate
181.4 GTexel/s
74%
May 1st, 2024
GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile
8 GB GDDR6 | 128-bit
Pixel Fillrate
81.36 GPixel/s
90%
Texel Fillrate
244.1 GTexel/s
100%
CPU Comparison
Compared by selected game FPS and Geekbench 5 benchmark scores
Apr 5th, 2024 • 1st Variation
Ryzen 7 7840HS
3.8 GHz | 8-core
Single-Core
2388
99%
Multi-Core
11190
97%
May 1st, 2024
Core Ultra 9 185H
2.3 GHz | 16-core
Single-Core
2401
100%
Multi-Core
11484
100%
Acer Nitro 16 Gaming Laptop | vs | Acer Predator Triton Neo 16 PTN16-51-92GF Notebook |
|---|---|---|
| Apr 5th, 2024 | Release Date | May 1st, 2024 |
| Ryzen 7 7840HS | CPU | Core Ultra 9 185H |
| GeForce RTX 4060 Mobile | GPU | GeForce RTX 4070 Mobile |
| 16 GB | RAM | 32 GB |
| N/A Storage | Storage | 2 TB SSD |
| 1920x1080 | Resolution | 1920x1080 |
| 165 Hz | Refresh Rate | 165 Hz |
| 16" | Screen Size | 16" |
