RTX A500 Embedded vs RTX A2000 in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
The RTX A500 Embedded is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the RTX A2000. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the RTX A500 Embedded
- Consumes up to 71% less energy – 20 vs 70 Watts
Advantages of the RTX A2000
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory – 6 vs 4 GB
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 FPS Calculator
The GPU's performance with selected game settings
RTX A500 Embedded
Mar 30th, 2022
Average FPS
61
73%
Min 1% FPS
27
63%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
RTX A2000
Aug 10th, 2021
Average FPS
84
100%
Min 1% FPS
43
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The RTX A500 Embedded vs RTX A2000 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The RTX A500 Embedded vs RTX A2000 in core GPU performance specifications
RTX A500 Embedded
Mar 30th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
67%
Memory Bandwidth
96 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
42.72 GPixel/s
74%
Texture Fillrate
85.44 GTexel/s
68%
FP32
5.468 TFLOPS
68%
RTX A2000
Aug 10th, 2021
Memory
6 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
288 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
57.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
124.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
7.987 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of core specifications
RTX A500 Embedded | SpecificationsComparison of core specifications | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Mar 30th, 2022 | Release Date | Aug 10th, 2021 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $449.00 |
| Ampere-MW (Ax000) | Generation | Workstation Ampere (Ax000) |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
20 W | Power Consumption | 70 W |
