The ROG Ally GPU is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Quadro M6000. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the ROG Ally GPU
- Consumes up to 88% less energy – 30 vs 250 Watts
- Up to 33% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 12 GB
Advantages of the Quadro M6000
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
ROG Ally GPU vs Quadro M6000
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
All items are out of stock.
Quadro M6000
Mar 21st, 2015
Average FPS
78
100%
Min 1% FPS
39
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Synthetic Benchmarks
The ROG Ally GPU vs Quadro M6000 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The ROG Ally GPU vs Quadro M6000 in core GPU performance specifications
ROG Ally GPU
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
51.2 GB/s
16%
Pixel Fillrate
20 GPixel/s
19%
Texture Fillrate
40 GTexel/s
19%
FP32
2.56 TFLOPS
37%
Quadro M6000
Mar 21st, 2015
Memory
12 GB
75%
Memory Bandwidth
317.4 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
106.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
213.9 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
6.844 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
ROG Ally GPU | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Quadro M6000 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| – | Release Date | Mar 21st, 2015 |
| $599.00 | MSRP | Not Available |
| Console GPU (ASUS) | Generation | Quadro Maxwell (Mx000) |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
30 W | Power Consumption | 250 W |
| Memory | ||
16 GB | Memory Size | 12 GB |
| LPDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 384-bit |
| 51.2 GB/s | Bandwidth | 317.4 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 20 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 106.9 GPixel/s |
| 40 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 213.9 GTexel/s |
| 2.56 TFLOPS | FP32 | 6.844 TFLOPS |
