The Radeon RX 6700M is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6700M
The GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile is better in every way
Advantages of the GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Consumes up to 11% less energy – 120 vs 135 Watts
- Up to 60% more VRAM memory – 16 vs 10 GB
Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6700M
May 31st, 2021
Average FPS
104
61%
Min 1% FPS
58
55%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Average FPS
170
100%
Min 1% FPS
105
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6700M vs GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6700M
May 31st, 2021
Memory
10 GB
62%
Memory Bandwidth
320 GB/s
56%
Pixel Fillrate
153.6 GPixel/s
81%
Texture Fillrate
345.6 GTexel/s
67%
FP32
11.06 TFLOPS
34%
GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile
Jan 3rd, 2023
Memory
16 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
576 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
189.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
515.3 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
32.98 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6700M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce RTX 4090 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| May 31st, 2021 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2023 |
| Not Available | MSRP | Not Available |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | GeForce 40 Mobile |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 135 W | Power Consumption | 120 W |
| Memory | ||
| 10 GB | Memory Size | 16 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 160-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 320 GB/s | Bandwidth | 576 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 153.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 189.8 GPixel/s |
| 345.6 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 515.3 GTexel/s |
| 11.06 TFLOPS | FP32 | 32.98 TFLOPS |
