Key Differences
In short — Radeon RX 6700 XT outperforms Arc A750 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Arc A750 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Radeon RX 6700 XT is 588 days older than Arc A750.
Advantages of Radeon RX 6700 XT
- Performs up to 2% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Arc A750 - 59 vs 58 FPS
- Up to 50% more VRAM memory than Intel Arc A750 - 12 vs 8 GB
Advantages of Arc A750
- Up to 77% better value when playing Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Radeon RX 6700 XT - €3.95 vs €17.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 2% less energy than AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT - 225 vs 230 Watts
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 3rd, 2021
FPS
59
100%
Value, €/FPS
€17.43/FPS
23%
Price, €
€1028.57
22%
FPS Winner
Buy for €1,028.57 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 458 minutes ago
Buy for €228.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 457 minutes ago
My Games
With selected game settings
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Desktop • Mar 3rd, 2021
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2022
Theoretical Performance
Desktop • Mar 3rd, 2021
Pixel Fillrate
165.2 GPixel/s
61%
Texel Fillrate
413 GTexel/s
77%
Radeon RX 6700 XT | vs | Arc A750 |
---|---|---|
Mar 3rd, 2021 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
Navi II | Generation | Alchemist |
$479 | MSRP | $289 |
1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a | Outputs | 1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0 |
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin | Power Connectors | 1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
12 GB | Memory | 8 GB |
GDDR6 | Type | GDDR6 |
192-bit | Bus | 256-bit |
384 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
2321 MHz | Base Clock Speed | 2050 MHz |
2581 MHz | Boost Clock Speed | 2400 MHz |
2000 MHz | Memory Clock Speed | 2000 MHz |