The Radeon RX 6650M XT is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 6400. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6650M XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6400
- Consumes up to 56% less energy – 53 vs 120 Watts
Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Radeon RX 6400 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Jan 4th, 2022
Average FPS
102
100%
Min 1% FPS
57
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
63%
Min 1% FPS
31
54%
Price, €
€212
100%
Value, €/FPS
€3.31/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€212.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€158.33
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€129.37
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€139.00
In Stock
Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Radeon RX 6400 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Radeon RX 6400 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6650M XT vs Radeon RX 6400 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6650M XT
Jan 4th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
256 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
154.6 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
309.2 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.896 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
50%
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
48%
Texture Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
36%
FP32
3.565 TFLOPS
36%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6650M XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 6400 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jan 19th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $159.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | Navi II |
Laptop | Segment | Desktop |
| 120 W | Power Consumption | 53 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 4 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 128-bit | Memory Bus | 64-bit |
256 GB/s | Bandwidth | 128 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
154.6 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 74.27 GPixel/s |
309.2 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 111.4 GTexel/s |
9.896 TFLOPS | FP32 | 3.565 TFLOPS |
