The Radeon RX 6550M is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the Radeon RX 550. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6550M
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 4 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the Radeon RX 550
- Consumes up to 38% less energy – 50 vs 80 Watts
Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 550 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Average FPS
70
100%
Min 1% FPS
36
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Average FPS
47
67%
Min 1% FPS
20
56%
Price, €
€99.98
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.12/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€99.98
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€109.99
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€98.30
In Stock
Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 550 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 550 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6550M vs Radeon RX 550 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6550M
Jan 4th, 2023
Memory
4 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
144 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
90.88 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
181.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.816 TFLOPS
100%
Radeon RX 550
Apr 20th, 2017
Memory
2 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
112 GB/s
78%
Pixel Fillrate
18.93 GPixel/s
21%
Texture Fillrate
37.86 GTexel/s
21%
FP32
1.211 TFLOPS
21%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6550M | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon RX 550 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 4th, 2023 | Release Date | Apr 20th, 2017 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $79.00 |
| Navi Mobile | Generation | Polaris |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 80 W | Power Consumption | 50 W |
| Memory | ||
4 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
144 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
90.88 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 18.93 GPixel/s |
181.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 37.86 GTexel/s |
5.816 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.211 TFLOPS |
