The Radeon RX 6400 is a slightly slower gaming GPU than the Radeon R9 390. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 6400
- Consumes up to 81% less energy – 53 vs 275 Watts
Advantages of the Radeon R9 390
- A slightly faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon R9 390 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Average FPS
64
96%
Min 1% FPS
31
94%
Price, €
€166.27
100%
Value, €/FPS
€2.59/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€166.27
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€139.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€212.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€302.63
In Stock
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Average FPS
67
100%
Min 1% FPS
33
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon R9 390 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon R9 390 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 6400 vs Radeon R9 390 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 6400
Jan 19th, 2022
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
128 GB/s
33%
Pixel Fillrate
74.27 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
111.4 GTexel/s
70%
FP32
3.565 TFLOPS
70%
Radeon R9 390
Jun 18th, 2015
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
384 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
64 GPixel/s
86%
Texture Fillrate
160 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
5.12 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 6400 | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Radeon R9 390 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jan 19th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 18th, 2015 |
$159.00 | MSRP | $329.00 |
| Navi II | Generation | Pirate Islands |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
53 W | Power Consumption | 275 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 64-bit | Memory Bus | 512-bit |
| 128 GB/s | Bandwidth | 384 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
74.27 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 64 GPixel/s |
| 111.4 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 160 GTexel/s |
| 3.565 TFLOPS | FP32 | 5.12 TFLOPS |
