The Radeon RX 5700 XT is at least 2x faster gaming GPU than the GeForce GTX 1050. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 5700 XT
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 300% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 2 GB
Advantages of the GeForce GTX 1050
- Consumes up to 67% less energy – 75 vs 225 Watts
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1050 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Average FPS
104
100%
Min 1% FPS
58
100%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
GeForce GTX 1050
Oct 25th, 2016
Average FPS
51
49%
Min 1% FPS
22
38%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1050 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
The FPS you'll get in saved games
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1050 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce GTX 1050 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT
Jul 7th, 2019
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
448 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
121.9 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
304.8 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
9.754 TFLOPS
100%
GeForce GTX 1050
Oct 25th, 2016
Memory
2 GB
25%
Memory Bandwidth
112.1 GB/s
25%
Pixel Fillrate
46.56 GPixel/s
38%
Texture Fillrate
58.2 GTexel/s
19%
FP32
1.862 TFLOPS
19%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 5700 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | GeForce GTX 1050 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
Jul 7th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 25th, 2016 |
| $399.00 | MSRP | $109.00 |
| Navi | Generation | GeForce 10 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 225 W | Power Consumption | 75 W |
| Memory | ||
8 GB | Memory Size | 2 GB |
| GDDR6 | Memory Type | GDDR5 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 128-bit |
448 GB/s | Bandwidth | 112.1 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
121.9 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 46.56 GPixel/s |
304.8 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 58.2 GTexel/s |
9.754 TFLOPS | FP32 | 1.862 TFLOPS |
