The Radeon RX 560 XT is at least 2x slower gaming GPU than the Arc A750. We cannot compare value as at least one GPU is out of stock.
Advantages of the Radeon RX 560 XT
- Consumes up to 33% less energy – 150 vs 225 Watts
Advantages of the Arc A750
- At least 2x faster GPU for gaming
- Up to 100% more VRAM memory – 8 vs 4 GB
Radeon RX 560 XT vs Arc A750 for Gaming
The GPU's performance in selected game and settings
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Average FPS
64
52%
Min 1% FPS
31
44%
Price, €
Out of Stock
Value, €/FPS
Not Available
All items are out of stock.
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Average FPS
122
100%
Min 1% FPS
71
100%
Price, €
€210.79
100%
Value, €/FPS
€1.72/FPS
100%
Buy on Amazon
€210.79
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€262.52
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€229.32
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€271.00
In Stock
Buy on Amazon
€347.56
In Stock
Radeon RX 560 XT vs Arc A750 in My Games
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
The FPS you'll get in saved games, click on a game to change it
Add a Game
Select Settings
Synthetic Benchmarks
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs Arc A750 in synthetic GPU benchmarks
Performance Specifications
The Radeon RX 560 XT vs Arc A750 in core GPU performance specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT
Mar 13th, 2019
Memory
4 GB
50%
Memory Bandwidth
224 GB/s
44%
Pixel Fillrate
39.23 GPixel/s
15%
Texture Fillrate
137.3 GTexel/s
26%
FP32
4.394 TFLOPS
26%
Arc A750
Oct 12th, 2022
Memory
8 GB
100%
Memory Bandwidth
512 GB/s
100%
Pixel Fillrate
268.8 GPixel/s
100%
Texture Fillrate
537.6 GTexel/s
100%
FP32
17.2 TFLOPS
100%
Specifications
Comparison of all specifications
Radeon RX 560 XT | SpecificationsComparison of all specifications | Arc A750 |
|---|---|---|
| General | ||
| Mar 13th, 2019 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2022 |
| Not Available | MSRP | $289.00 |
| Polaris | Generation | Alchemist |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
150 W | Power Consumption | 225 W |
| Memory | ||
| 4 GB | Memory Size | 8 GB |
| GDDR5 | Memory Type | GDDR6 |
| 256-bit | Memory Bus | 256-bit |
| 224 GB/s | Bandwidth | 512 GB/s |
| Theoretical Performance | ||
| 39.23 GPixel/s | Pixel Fillrate | 268.8 GPixel/s |
| 137.3 GTexel/s | Texture Fillrate | 537.6 GTexel/s |
| 4.394 TFLOPS | FP32 | 17.2 TFLOPS |
